Nikola wrote: Вместо того, чтобы образовываться в данном вопросе по википедиям, почитайте самого Фрейда, отбросив предвзятость. Я зря не скажу.
My encyclopedia states that his theories were not scientific.
"On the question of what makes a theory a genuinely scientific one, Karl Popper's criterion of demarcation, as it is called, has now gained very general acceptance: ... if a theory is incompatible with possible observations it is scientific; conversely, a theory which is compatible with all possible observations is unscientific (Cf. Popper, K. The Logic of Scientific Discovery). ... And it is argued that nothing of the kind is possible with respect to Freud's theory - if, in relation to it, the question is asked: 'What does this theory imply which, if false, would show the whole theory to be false?', the answer is 'nothing', the theory is compatible with every possible state of affairs - it cannot be falsified by anything, since it purports to explain everything. Hence it is concluded that the theory is not scientific, and while this does not, as some critics claim, rob it of all value, it certainly diminishes its intellectual status"
http://www.iep.utm.edu/f/freud.htm#SH6a
Мальчик?Мальчик...
