Очень просто. Надо начать задавать себе вопросы о том, что происходит вокруг в GTA. Вас сразу обвинят в расизме. Это так принято у либералов подавлять инакомыслие.
Как я стал расистом в соответствие с либеральной доктриной.
Я слушал радио которое не принадлежит либералам. Какие принадлежат либералам и прочим красным. СBC.ca это либерализм, но иногда там есть хорошие передачи, которые не взирают на партийность. Например Фифт Эстате. Там о серьезном, а в Аэрофарсе или В этом часе 20 минут это сатира.
На радио либеральничают на 1010AМ в Торонто. О проблемах тоже говорят, но мало, в основном темы задаваемые обкуренным в дупель ведущим в прайм-тайм типа для чего в магазинах продают коровьи языки. http://www.cfrb.com/
Какое радио без промывания мозгов многокультурщиной и либеральщиной за наши деньги. Осталось только одно.
http://640toronto.com/
Вещание поделено на несколько секторов. Утром и вечером говорят о политике и делах в Торонто. В рабочий полдень и с 4 до 6 только о шайбе. Ну когда игра и вечером трансляция, то и вечером.
Когда говорят о политике часто говорят о том что происходит со страной и GTA в частности. Темы обсуждаются с 7 утра и до 12.
Вчера была передача Чарльза Адлера, с трех до четырех обычно идет.
Говорили о том, за что таких как я называют расистами. Например от том, что те кто называет себя консерваторами и сейчас у власти потратили 25 миллионов на открытие очередного посольства в Индии-Пакистане. Кто в этом посольстве визы получает тоже сказали. Из девяносто процентов с буквой М в графе пол аплаятся на нянь.
Понятно как это делается. Кто-то из их деревни уже приехавший сюда делает им вызов. Они приезжают сюда и делают что хотят. Один из примеров привел водитель грузовика позвонивший по телефону. Он с такими работал. По английски не говорят, не читают, но имеют права на вождение. Как делается. Да другие из их Брамптона за них сдают.
Вот такие обсуждения и называют здесь рассизмом.
А то что в России столько же населения, что и в Пакистане, и там водители грузовиков знают, что такое снег и светофоры и что они поехали бы сюда поработать, но они почему-то хуже паков, раз их сюда не пускают, это не расизм, а сказки о том, что из России ехать не хотят.
Кстати, вчера там же говорили и о том, что Англия которая трещит по швам, хочет ввести новые правила. Суть в том, что если после года пребывания в Англии вновь прибывший не адаптрируется, то делать ему в Англии нечего. Позвонил ретывый адвокатишко из Торонто и начал петь псалмы о том что Канада большая страна и что только 32 миллиона. Типичная брехня. О том что 90 процентов населения Канады в стомильной зоне от границы со Штатами он естественно молчит, и что остальные девяносто процентов страны мало пригодны для жилья он тоже умалчивает. Такие как он тычут в карту и говорят, страна большая на всех хватит.
Как стать расистом.
-
Старый Ко
- Коверный
- Posts: 5661
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 10:05 am
- Location: Шапито Милтон Онтарио (выступает в антрактах)
- Contact:
Как стать расистом.
Last edited by Старый Ко on Fri Feb 22, 2008 12:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Как стать рассистом.
ну почему же не хотят?Старый Ко wrote:А то что в России столько же населения, что и в Пакистане, и там водители грузовиков знают, что такое снег и светофоры и что они поехали бы сюда поработать, но они почему-то хуже паков, раз их сюда не пускают, это не рассизм, а сказки о том, что из России ехать не хотят.
-
Старый Ко
- Коверный
- Posts: 5661
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 10:05 am
- Location: Шапито Милтон Онтарио (выступает в антрактах)
- Contact:
Там о фиктивных браках.
Да из России уезжают женщины. Я знаю много таких случаев лично. И наша родственница в этом году так уехала. Не по любви, а потому-что ее муж с двумя детьми в России бросил. По совести этот брак фиктивный. А по жизни, ее дети живут в центре Европы.
Опять же пишут в этой ссылке про то, что наши фиктивничают.
А вы помните о скандале с индийским посольством в том году когда вскрылось что у совершенно разных брачующихся там для въезда сюда были абсолютно одинаковые фотографии.
Да из России уезжают женщины. Я знаю много таких случаев лично. И наша родственница в этом году так уехала. Не по любви, а потому-что ее муж с двумя детьми в России бросил. По совести этот брак фиктивный. А по жизни, ее дети живут в центре Европы.
Опять же пишут в этой ссылке про то, что наши фиктивничают.
А вы помните о скандале с индийским посольством в том году когда вскрылось что у совершенно разных брачующихся там для въезда сюда были абсолютно одинаковые фотографии.
-
Старый Ко
- Коверный
- Posts: 5661
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 10:05 am
- Location: Шапито Милтон Онтарио (выступает в антрактах)
- Contact:
Это тоже любимая карта.
Как только говорят что Джейн и Финч это рассадник преступности - кричат о том что нельзя обезать черных.
Как только мужик взял за попу двух китайцев в Тимминсе за выращивание марихуаны его обвинили в рассизме. Адвокаты на суде.
Почему. Да потому-что полицейских заподозрил китайцев именно потому, что согласно всем сообщениям в прессе почти каждый дом где выращивают марихуану оказывается с китайцами.
Сколько в моей ссылке о паразитах случаев с выходцами из СССР.
Один. Я что специально выбираю. Нет. Как только какой случай с выходцами из.... я пишу об этом.
Как только говорят что Джейн и Финч это рассадник преступности - кричат о том что нельзя обезать черных.
Как только мужик взял за попу двух китайцев в Тимминсе за выращивание марихуаны его обвинили в рассизме. Адвокаты на суде.
Почему. Да потому-что полицейских заподозрил китайцев именно потому, что согласно всем сообщениям в прессе почти каждый дом где выращивают марихуану оказывается с китайцами.
Сколько в моей ссылке о паразитах случаев с выходцами из СССР.
Один. Я что специально выбираю. Нет. Как только какой случай с выходцами из.... я пишу об этом.
-
Старый Ко
- Коверный
- Posts: 5661
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 10:05 am
- Location: Шапито Милтон Онтарио (выступает в антрактах)
- Contact:
Прорвало одного школьного работника. Теперь и его обвиняют в рассизме.
Вот его оригинальное письмо:
Quote:
Let me be the first to accuse Mr. Jack Foote of prejudice. Clearly, Mr. Foote is prejudiced in favour of all that is good about Canada, and fearful of all those things which work against maintaining this, the finest country in the world. Good for you, Mr. Foote, I have seldom read Canadian cultural argument written with such pride, candour, clarity and conviction. Although an immigrant Canadian, Mr. Foote has recognized many of the changes foisted on this country by misguided politicians who were motivated only for re-election and not armed with the determination to sustain Canadian values through vision, patriotism and love of country, with its magnificent future potential. Instead, the failure of imposed multiculturalism, superimposed on the divisiveness of bilingualism, may ultimately prove the downfall of this magnificent country, in which I grew up and came to revere. As one who was born here, I feel compelled to write in support of Mr. Foote's candid observations.
Mr. Foote has clearly described the crass imposition of bilingualism solely as a government vote-getting instrument, with no regard for the divisiveness it would cause, and he rightly deplores our damaging immigration policies. When will Canadians realize that there is no beneficial offset to the easily-obtained Canadian citizenship that should demand the allegiance of a newcomer? Most immigrants do not bring even a modest understanding of Canadian history or values. Many bring their old-country feuds and hatreds, to be paraded and re-fought on Canadian soil. How could such people be expected to understand and offer a staunch Canadian loyalty to the future of this "Western" country with its Western values when we don't even ask, or require them to do so?
For example, consider the 800,000 Muslims now resident in Canada, some of whom are Islamic extremist. Do their Imams embrace and preach Western values, or do they condone the Islamic university student who declared on the Internet that it would be better to kill Canadian soldiers in Canada rather than let them fight in Afghanistan? Or what about their low regard for women and their "eastern" Sharia law beliefs that allow a father to kill his daughter for not wearing a Habib? Or Indian immigrants who blow up aircraft in order to settle old, foreign scores, and who demand that Mounties wear turbans and students wear daggers to school? Or gun- toting Jamaicans who prefer to settle scores by bullets on the streets rather than by Canadian law in the courts? Or Sri Lankan Tamils who use Canada as a source of funds for homeland rebellion? Or Canadian passport-carrying Leb-anese residents who demand to be saved by Canada when their homeland goes up in flames?
I do not suggest forcing landed Canadians to return to their home countries. A deal is a deal! But we should not be allowing further reinforcements for questionable causes and we don't need more people to bring with them foreign problems as well as cause more domestic ones. Left un-reinforced, these new "Canadians" may ultimately learn to love the true meaning of being "Canadian" and we should be accelerating such change in attitude by teaching more Canadian history and civics in our schools.
But why do we continue to delude ourselves that we are better off with a virtual "open door" policy on immigration? Do we not recognize that in addition to creating a modern "Trojan Horse" situation, these quasi-Canadians cause Canada additional economic and environmental distress? Do they not require public support funds? Do they not take Canadian jobs? Do they not cause increased use of scarce agricultural land for new dwellings? Do they not buy cars which add to road congestion and increase environmental pollution? Do they not cause the U.S., our good neighbour and major trading partner, concern about our sieve-like immigration policies and who are now tightening up a formerly open border? Do they not reduce each Canadian citizen's share of this country's wealth? Do they not congregate in ghetto-like enclaves to harbour their own particular ethnic complaints, while they make demands against the Canadian establishment? (Africentric schools, for example.)
It is an great fallacy to believe that we "need" major immigration. Canada should only admit people who have the particular skills Canada needs and who share Canadians' beliefs. We Canadians, who have shown such courage and resolve over the past three centuries, have certainly become apathetic about our glorious history, our former and now dwindling reputation for law and order, our prevention of foreign takeover of our industries, our language, our national pride, our former good influence in world affairs, and our resolve to defend and maintain, unsullied, this beautiful and blessed land, for our children and all future generations.
If Canadians would spend as much time condemning the immigration of uninformed, mis-fitting, and sometimes violent immigrants who are aberrations to Canadian society, as we do carping about our American friends, our neighbours, and protectors, we would be far better off and a far happier country. Why do we welcome our enemies, but disparage our friends? History requires us to share North America with our American friends, but it does not require us to undermine our society by splitting it into a hundred incompatible parts, with some of those parts anathema to Canada's well being.
Thank goodness for "new" Canadians like Mr. Foote who see us for what we are, what we were, and what we may become because of our preoccupation with the political correctness that muzzles open discussion of all that is worthwhile in Canada, and denies what most Canadians want for our country.
For goodness sake people, get excited about this travesty, get involved..... call your MP and tell him to turn off the immigration tap before it's too late.
GORDON GILCHRIST Baltimore
А здесь как его мочат на почве расизма
При этом новости у них одни и теже что и тут.
Китайцы выращивают марихуану
http://www.thepeterboroughexaminer.com/ ... x?e=931900
Вот его оригинальное письмо:
Quote:
Let me be the first to accuse Mr. Jack Foote of prejudice. Clearly, Mr. Foote is prejudiced in favour of all that is good about Canada, and fearful of all those things which work against maintaining this, the finest country in the world. Good for you, Mr. Foote, I have seldom read Canadian cultural argument written with such pride, candour, clarity and conviction. Although an immigrant Canadian, Mr. Foote has recognized many of the changes foisted on this country by misguided politicians who were motivated only for re-election and not armed with the determination to sustain Canadian values through vision, patriotism and love of country, with its magnificent future potential. Instead, the failure of imposed multiculturalism, superimposed on the divisiveness of bilingualism, may ultimately prove the downfall of this magnificent country, in which I grew up and came to revere. As one who was born here, I feel compelled to write in support of Mr. Foote's candid observations.
Mr. Foote has clearly described the crass imposition of bilingualism solely as a government vote-getting instrument, with no regard for the divisiveness it would cause, and he rightly deplores our damaging immigration policies. When will Canadians realize that there is no beneficial offset to the easily-obtained Canadian citizenship that should demand the allegiance of a newcomer? Most immigrants do not bring even a modest understanding of Canadian history or values. Many bring their old-country feuds and hatreds, to be paraded and re-fought on Canadian soil. How could such people be expected to understand and offer a staunch Canadian loyalty to the future of this "Western" country with its Western values when we don't even ask, or require them to do so?
For example, consider the 800,000 Muslims now resident in Canada, some of whom are Islamic extremist. Do their Imams embrace and preach Western values, or do they condone the Islamic university student who declared on the Internet that it would be better to kill Canadian soldiers in Canada rather than let them fight in Afghanistan? Or what about their low regard for women and their "eastern" Sharia law beliefs that allow a father to kill his daughter for not wearing a Habib? Or Indian immigrants who blow up aircraft in order to settle old, foreign scores, and who demand that Mounties wear turbans and students wear daggers to school? Or gun- toting Jamaicans who prefer to settle scores by bullets on the streets rather than by Canadian law in the courts? Or Sri Lankan Tamils who use Canada as a source of funds for homeland rebellion? Or Canadian passport-carrying Leb-anese residents who demand to be saved by Canada when their homeland goes up in flames?
I do not suggest forcing landed Canadians to return to their home countries. A deal is a deal! But we should not be allowing further reinforcements for questionable causes and we don't need more people to bring with them foreign problems as well as cause more domestic ones. Left un-reinforced, these new "Canadians" may ultimately learn to love the true meaning of being "Canadian" and we should be accelerating such change in attitude by teaching more Canadian history and civics in our schools.
But why do we continue to delude ourselves that we are better off with a virtual "open door" policy on immigration? Do we not recognize that in addition to creating a modern "Trojan Horse" situation, these quasi-Canadians cause Canada additional economic and environmental distress? Do they not require public support funds? Do they not take Canadian jobs? Do they not cause increased use of scarce agricultural land for new dwellings? Do they not buy cars which add to road congestion and increase environmental pollution? Do they not cause the U.S., our good neighbour and major trading partner, concern about our sieve-like immigration policies and who are now tightening up a formerly open border? Do they not reduce each Canadian citizen's share of this country's wealth? Do they not congregate in ghetto-like enclaves to harbour their own particular ethnic complaints, while they make demands against the Canadian establishment? (Africentric schools, for example.)
It is an great fallacy to believe that we "need" major immigration. Canada should only admit people who have the particular skills Canada needs and who share Canadians' beliefs. We Canadians, who have shown such courage and resolve over the past three centuries, have certainly become apathetic about our glorious history, our former and now dwindling reputation for law and order, our prevention of foreign takeover of our industries, our language, our national pride, our former good influence in world affairs, and our resolve to defend and maintain, unsullied, this beautiful and blessed land, for our children and all future generations.
If Canadians would spend as much time condemning the immigration of uninformed, mis-fitting, and sometimes violent immigrants who are aberrations to Canadian society, as we do carping about our American friends, our neighbours, and protectors, we would be far better off and a far happier country. Why do we welcome our enemies, but disparage our friends? History requires us to share North America with our American friends, but it does not require us to undermine our society by splitting it into a hundred incompatible parts, with some of those parts anathema to Canada's well being.
Thank goodness for "new" Canadians like Mr. Foote who see us for what we are, what we were, and what we may become because of our preoccupation with the political correctness that muzzles open discussion of all that is worthwhile in Canada, and denies what most Canadians want for our country.
For goodness sake people, get excited about this travesty, get involved..... call your MP and tell him to turn off the immigration tap before it's too late.
GORDON GILCHRIST Baltimore
А здесь как его мочат на почве расизма
При этом новости у них одни и теже что и тут.
Китайцы выращивают марихуану
http://www.thepeterboroughexaminer.com/ ... x?e=931900
-
Старый Ко
- Коверный
- Posts: 5661
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 10:05 am
- Location: Шапито Милтон Онтарио (выступает в антрактах)
- Contact:
Re: Как стать расистом.
Нобелевский лауреат попал в расисты
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/u ... 677098.ece
“all our social policies are based on the fact that their intelligence is the same as ours - whereas all the testing says not really.". He said he hoped that everyone was equal, but countered that “people who have to deal with black employees find this not true”.
He says that you should not discriminate on the basis of colour, because “there are many people of colour who are very talented, but don’t promote them when they haven’t succeeded at the lower level”.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/u ... 677098.ece
“all our social policies are based on the fact that their intelligence is the same as ours - whereas all the testing says not really.". He said he hoped that everyone was equal, but countered that “people who have to deal with black employees find this not true”.
He says that you should not discriminate on the basis of colour, because “there are many people of colour who are very talented, but don’t promote them when they haven’t succeeded at the lower level”.
Re: Как стать расистом.
In medieval Europe if you didn't like somebody's argument and couldn't think of a real response you called them a witch and demanded they be burned at the stake. In the US you call them unpatriotic, and in Canada you call them racist.
“I’m not going to censor myself to comfort your ignorance”
"People should not be afraid of their governments, governments should be afraid of their people"
"People should not be afraid of their governments, governments should be afraid of their people"
-
Старый Ко
- Коверный
- Posts: 5661
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 10:05 am
- Location: Шапито Милтон Онтарио (выступает в антрактах)
- Contact:
Re: Как стать расистом.
Вот еще одна мысль на тему что в современной Канаде принято называть расизмом.
"...Nobody in politics wants to comment on the ethnic crime problems that exist in Toronto or Vancouver, or the learning difficulties and behavioural problems involving children of certain ethnic origins. It's not politically correct to mention that in a certain Toronto sub-division, an ethnic group that accounts for 5% of the population, accounts for 95% of the crime in the area. This too is part of Canada's immigration problem, but is too sensitive to be discussed in Parliament..."
http://www.quebecoislibre.org/021026-7.htm
"...Nobody in politics wants to comment on the ethnic crime problems that exist in Toronto or Vancouver, or the learning difficulties and behavioural problems involving children of certain ethnic origins. It's not politically correct to mention that in a certain Toronto sub-division, an ethnic group that accounts for 5% of the population, accounts for 95% of the crime in the area. This too is part of Canada's immigration problem, but is too sensitive to be discussed in Parliament..."
http://www.quebecoislibre.org/021026-7.htm